Cognitive Criticism: Resources and Lesson from #GREAT15

Cognitive Criticism: Prezi Presentation

Lesson:

How do you engage the adolescent learners in novel study? Do you access student background knowledge? Prepare them with vocabulary ahead of time? Give them non-fiction readings to determine their schema?

Recently, neuroscientists are starting to come out with their findings on the adolescent mind, and literary theorists are connecting with them. From this connection, cognitive criticism has developed as a new way of thinking about how we teach literature and how students read literature. Its basis didn't develop from empirical studies and doesn't support teaching students to look only at the facts of a novel. Instead, cognitive criticism has developed as a framework for expanding student schema and teaching them the skills necessary to develop empathy, decision making, perception, and reasoning. At the same time, it acknowledges the importance of developing language and memory because language and the above skills help to expand a student's schema. Cognitive criticism isn't a way of reading literature, but rather "a way of thinking about literature" (Nikolajeva). Throughout today's session at #GREAT15, I'll introduce a technology called blendspace, which I believe can help our students to record their thoughts, develop vocabulary, recognize literary codes, and expand their schemas through a culminating themes project.

How I see using blendspace for The Outsiders:https://www.blendspace.com/lessons/ojFe8mqCF7u4GA/

References:

Applegate, M. D., Applegate, A. J., & Modla, V. B. (2009). "She's my best

reader; she just can't comprehend": Studying the relationship between

fluency and comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 62(6), 512-521.

Retrieved from

http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docvie

w/203276963?accountid=12598

Bernaerts, L., de Geest, D., Vervaeck, B., & Herman, L. (2013). Stories and Minds :

Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska

Press.

Fisher, Douglas, Nancy Frey, and Diane Lapp. "Building and Activating

Students' Background Knowledge: It's what they Already Know that

Counts." Middle School Journal 43.3 (2012): 22-31. ProQuest. Web. 10 July 2015.

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Close Reading as an Intervention for Struggling

Middle School Readers. Journal Of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(5), 367-376.

Fisher, D, & Ivey, G. (2006). Evaluating the interventions for struggling

adolescent readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(3),

180-189. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url

=http://search.proquest.com/docview/216917730?accountid=12598

Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2010). Motivation requires a meaningful task. English

Journal, 100(1), 30-36. Retrieved fromhttp://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?

url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/749381976?accountid=12598

Gelzheiser, L., Hallgren-Flynn, L., Connors, M. & Scanlon, D. (2014). Reading

Thematically Related Texts to Develop Knowledge and Comprehension. The

Reading Teacher, 68(1), 53–63 doi:10.1002/trtr.1271

Gilakjani, A. P., Leong, L. M., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Teachers’ use of technology and

constructivism. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science

(IJMECS), 5(4), 49.

Kamil, M. L., Pearson, P. D., & Birr, M. E. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of Reading

Research. Florence, KY, USA: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.ebrary.com

Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind.Science, 342(6156), 377-380. doi:10.1126/science.1239918

Nikolajeva, M. (2014). Reading for Learning : Cognitive Approaches to Children's

Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Verhoeven, L. T., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Literacy and motivation: Reading engagement

in individuals and groups. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.